January 16, 2026

4 Ways Bitcoin Mining Actively Reduces Methane Emissions

Bitcoin mining is often​ criticized for‍ its ⁢energy use, but a growing number of operations are‌ quietly​ emerging⁤ as ‍powerful tools in⁣ the fight against climate change-specifically methane ‌emissions. In⁣ this⁣ article,​ you’ll explore‌ four concrete ​ways Bitcoin miners are capturing methane at its source,⁢ powering off-grid facilities, and converting what was once⁢ a waste gas into productive energy. Through real-world examples⁣ and practical use cases, ⁤you’ll ‍see how these ⁣four approaches are reshaping the narrative ‌around crypto and offering a ⁢glimpse⁢ of how digital ⁣infrastructure can be aligned with⁢ environmental goals.
1) ​Capturing ‌and ⁤Monetizing Flared Gas:⁢ Bitcoin miners colocate with oil and ⁤gas operations to ‌convert‌ previously flared methane‌ into electricity for mining, ‍turning ⁤a waste‍ stream into revenue while sharply cutting ⁣methane's climate impact by burning it as CO₂ instead of venting it

1) Capturing and Monetizing Flared⁢ Gas: Bitcoin ‌miners colocate with oil and gas operations to⁢ convert previously flared methane into electricity for mining, turning a waste stream into revenue while sharply cutting methane’s climate impact by burning it⁤ as CO₂ ⁢instead of venting it

Instead of watching‍ methane-rich associated​ gas go up in‍ flames above remote oil‍ wells, a growing number of operators ⁣are piping ⁢it straight into​ containerized Bitcoin ‌mining rigs. These​ mobile data ⁢centers sit on-site, ‌connecting directly to generators that ‌convert gas ⁢into electricity, and in doing‌ so, they transform a regulatory headache into a new revenue stream.By combusting​ methane and ‍using the energy⁤ to secure ⁤the Bitcoin⁤ network, miners help operators comply with ⁣flaring⁢ regulations, reduce visible pollution, and ‍unlock value from gas that⁤ was previously⁤ too uneconomical to ⁣process or transport.

  • On-site generators convert stranded gas into ⁣power for mining ⁤hardware.
  • Modular mining​ units ⁢ are ‌deployed like industrial equipment,moved as wells ‍mature.
  • Reduced flaring ⁢and⁤ venting cuts local air pollution and ‌greenhouse gas intensity.
  • New cash flow helps ⁣fund​ cleaner infrastructure and emissions controls.
Case⁤ Study Gas Use Estimated Methane⁣ Impact Economic ​Outcome
U.S.⁣ Shale Partner Stranded associated ⁤gas ⁣at⁤ remote ​pads ~90%+ reduction versus ⁣open venting via controlled combustion Turns compliance cost into ‍monthly⁤ mining revenue
Canadian​ Pilot ⁤Site Previously ⁢flared gas​ on marginal wells Lower ‌lifecycle emissions ⁣per⁣ barrel produced Extends field life and​ funds ‌well⁤ remediation

What ⁢makes this approach climate-relevant is‌ the chemistry: methane has⁣ far greater ‌short-term warming ⁣power than carbon ⁤dioxide,​ so burning it in ⁢a generator-even imperfectly-can dramatically⁣ cut ⁢its overall ⁤climate footprint. Environmental‌ engineers​ working with⁣ mining firms⁢ frequently enough track metrics such as gas⁣ volume captured, flare hours avoided, ​and CO₂e reduced ⁣per ⁣megawatt mined to‌ verify impact.⁣ As regulators​ tighten methane​ rules in‍ jurisdictions from Texas to⁣ Alberta,‍ these⁤ colocated ⁢mining deployments are‍ beginning to function as​ an incentive-aligned⁤ cleanup‍ service:⁤ the more waste gas they capture and monetize, the lower the emissions profile of⁢ the oilfield that ​hosts them.

2)‍ Deploying Off-grid Micro-Mining at Landfills: Small, modular mining ⁣rigs are being installed directly at landfill sites to run on‌ captured landfill gas, creating ‌a financial incentive to ⁣improve methane capture systems and reduce uncontrolled emissions from decomposing waste

At‌ modern⁤ landfill sites, small Bitcoin mining containers are increasingly being treated ‌like plug-and-play emissions ​scrubbers. Rather of ‍waiting for a large⁤ utility-scale project to justify the cost of a full ‌gas-to-grid installation, ⁤operators can ​drop‌ in a modular mining unit that runs⁤ directly on landfill gas. These off-grid rigs are ⁣built to⁢ handle⁤ variable gas⁢ flows and can be⁤ scaled up or down ‌as‍ the ⁢methane capture system​ improves,​ turning what was once ‍a liability into⁣ a ⁤revenue-generating micro​ power plant.

this model reshapes the economics of‌ landfill ‌gas management. by ‌converting captured methane into ​electricity for mining, operators gain a ⁤ new, immediate⁣ revenue stream that helps offset⁢ the capital cost of better gas wells, piping,⁣ and flares.​ In⁣ practice,⁤ that means fewer leaky‌ collection points and more incentive to seal⁢ and cover cells‌ correctly. Rather of flaring off low-volume gas or ‌venting it​ when prices⁢ are ‌low,‌ site⁣ managers can route it ⁢to a dedicated mining array that ‌keeps running regardless of grid access or wholesale power‍ prices.

  • Rapid deployment: Containerized rigs​ can be⁣ delivered and activated in weeks, not years.
  • Location-flexible: ​Operates at remote ​landfills ‌with no grid tie-in.
  • Scalable: Additional units can be stacked as⁢ gas capture⁢ expands.
  • Emission-focused: ‌Targets‌ methane that woudl⁢ otherwise be flared⁣ or vented.
Landfill Gas Use Typical Barrier how Micro-Mining Helps
pipeline injection High grid connection⁢ cost Uses gas on-site, no ‌pipeline needed
On-site power⁣ plant Requires large, ‌steady gas volume Profitable even‍ at smaller scales
Simple ​flaring Generates no revenue Turns flared gas into⁤ Bitcoin ⁢income

3) Stabilizing Biogas Projects⁤ on Farms: By‍ acting⁤ as a flexible, on-demand ⁤buyer of​ power, Bitcoin mining underwrites anaerobic digesters⁣ on livestock farms, ensuring⁣ that methane ‌from manure is consistently captured and⁣ combusted rather than escaping ‌into the atmosphere ​when ⁢traditional power ⁣buyers are unavailable

On ⁣many livestock farms, ​anaerobic digesters live or die by whether‍ someone ‌is willing to buy ‌their electricity at any given moment. Utilities often cap how much intermittent ⁢biogas power they’ll accept, and⁤ wholesale⁢ prices can⁣ crash‌ during off-peak hours,⁤ leaving⁣ expensive digesters sitting idle‌ and methane vented or⁢ flared⁣ inconsistently. By colocating⁤ modular Bitcoin⁢ mining units directly next to digesters, farmers ​gain a 24/7, location-agnostic buyer of electricity that can absorb every extra kilowatt the ⁤system ⁤produces, ⁤even when the grid can’t or won’t. This turns ⁤fragile ‍project‍ economics‍ into ⁤a more predictable revenue stream,⁤ giving ‍lenders⁣ and developers⁢ a reason to keep building ⁢and ⁤upgrading manure-to-energy facilities.

The unique ⁢value of ⁢mining is its ability to ramp demand up‌ or down in seconds.When grid prices⁢ are high, power can be sold ‍conventionally; when they‍ fall, miners automatically switch on ​to consume excess generation‌ that ⁢would otherwise force the ​digester⁤ to throttle back. This flexibility helps ensure​ that⁢ methane from manure‍ is continuously captured and​ combusted rather of escaping during periods of low grid demand. On-farm operators gain an extra tool to⁤ manage both environmental compliance and ⁢cash flow, while local communities benefit from reduced odors, fewer emissions, and the potential for ⁢new jobs in electrical,‍ mechanical, and‍ data-center maintenance.

  • Continuous methane capture even ⁢when utilities curtail‍ purchases
  • Improved project ​bankability ‌thanks to‍ an always-available power buyer
  • Local economic uplift via​ new technical and⁣ operational roles
  • Lower climate footprint as‍ potent methane ‌is converted into CO₂ and ‍useful work
Farm ​Scenario without Mining With Mining
Dairy digester in off-peak hours Biogas ⁣flared or​ output curtailed Power routed ⁣to ‍miners at stable​ revenue
New ⁣digester financing Borderline‍ economics, delayed ‌build extra ⁤cash flow from mining secures⁣ funding
emission outcome Irregular methane destruction Consistent ‌capture and combustion

4)‌ Incentivizing ⁢Methane Mitigation in Remote Fields: In isolated oilfields and gas patches with no ‍pipeline⁣ access, mobile Bitcoin mining units⁤ provide ⁤a portable market for stranded methane, encouraging operators to⁣ deploy ‌gas capture ​technologies​ instead​ of routine venting or ⁢flaring and making compliance with emerging methane regulations more economically attractive

Far from the glare ‌of city ‍lights,​ some of ​the dirtiest methane ⁢leaks happen​ in places regulators ​rarely see: small, ⁤scattered wells and remote gas fields with no⁢ pipeline access. Traditionally, operators have ‌had‍ two bad​ options-vent the gas directly into the‍ atmosphere ⁤or flare⁤ it off inefficiently. Mobile⁤ bitcoin ‌mining units are‍ changing that calculus by acting as a portable, on‑demand buyer ‌of stranded ‍gas, turning what ‍was once a regulatory headache into​ a ​revenue stream.Instead of wasting methane, producers‌ can now ​convert⁢ it into electricity ⁣on site and feed that power into modular ⁣mining containers ⁤parked right beside​ the wellhead.

This ⁣shift⁢ is already visible⁤ in early‑stage ⁣deployments across ⁤North ​America and‌ beyond.Climate‑focused ​mining‍ firms roll in with containerized data centers,‌ generators tuned ‍for variable ‍gas flows,‍ and monitoring​ equipment that logs‍ both ⁢hash rate and emissions performance. The ⁣pitch to ‌operators​ is ‌straightforward: share in the ⁣ bitcoin revenue,⁢ reduce‌ visible flaring, and ‌stay ⁢ahead ​of ‌tightening methane⁤ caps. For regulators ⁢and investors under ‍pressure​ to ⁢show tangible reductions in ⁣climate ‌risk, these projects provide ⁢ auditable, field‑level evidence that high‑GWP methane is being combusted ‌and converted into a much ⁤lower‑impact ‌CO₂ ⁣footprint.

  • Portable ⁤demand for⁤ gas where no pipeline exists
  • Rapid deployment with⁢ skid‑mounted generators and containers
  • Shared upside ⁣ between ⁢miners ⁢and field ‌operators
  • built‑in monitoring for⁣ emissions⁢ and production ⁤data
Field Scenario Old Outcome With⁣ Mobile BTC Mining
Isolated oil ‌well Routine ‌venting Gas captured and mined
Remote gas ⁤patch Inefficient ‍flaring Continuous, cleaner combustion
Shut‑in ​marginal site Zero⁤ revenue,​ leaking ⁣gas New⁢ income​ plus methane abatement

Crucially, this​ model reframes‌ methane⁢ mitigation from a‌ pure compliance cost into a profit‑linked ⁤operational upgrade. As jurisdictions⁢ from⁢ the U.S. to the EU phase‍ in ‍tougher methane rules ​and potential leak‑based​ fees, producers in off‑grid ⁢regions can point ‍to on‑site⁣ Bitcoin⁣ mining as a concrete ⁢mitigation step that⁤ pays for itself. Over time,competition⁣ for low‑cost,stranded gas may ‌spur⁢ wider ⁢adoption of gas ‌capture⁣ skids,better leak ⁣detection,and‌ more ⁢sophisticated micro‑grid controls.​ The result is a⁣ rare alignment: the same commercial incentive driving miners toward cheap energy also pushes remote ⁢operators to eliminate one of ‍the most⁢ potent⁣ and overlooked⁣ climate ​pollutants.

Q&A

How‌ can Bitcoin mining help ⁢reduce⁢ methane ⁢emissions instead‌ of‌ worsening climate change?

bitcoin‍ mining is often‌ criticized for‍ its energy ‍consumption, but a⁣ growing number of projects are⁢ showing⁤ that it⁢ can ⁣actually⁢ be used as a climate tool-specifically to cut methane emissions. Methane (CH₄) is a greenhouse⁤ gas that is more than⁤ 80 ​times more powerful⁤ than CO₂ over a 20-year⁢ period.Much⁤ of it comes from “stranded” or ​”waste” sources‍ such as flared natural gas ‌at oil ‌wells, leaking landfills,⁣ and agricultural operations.

Bitcoin​ miners are⁣ uniquely suited to locate next to ‍these methane ​sources and turn what would ⁣otherwise be ⁢wasted, highly polluting gas into productive ⁤electricity. By consuming methane-derived energy that would have been vented or flared, ‍mining operations⁤ can:

  • Convert methane ​into CO₂ and​ water, dramatically ⁤lowering ⁢its warming impact.
  • Monetize waste gas,‍ creating ⁣financial incentives to capture⁣ and manage emissions.
  • Run ⁢off-grid ⁣ in remote areas where connecting to ⁢power lines is‍ uneconomic or unfeasible.
  • Scale flexibly, as ⁢mining rigs‌ can be switched on​ or ⁢off quickly​ as gas availability ⁤changes.

In⁢ this way, ​Bitcoin‌ mining can shift from being a⁤ passive energy⁢ consumer‌ to an active participant in methane⁤ mitigation strategies across multiple sectors.

What role does Bitcoin⁣ mining play in reducing methane ⁢from oil and gas ​flaring?

Oil production ⁤frequently enough ‌brings natural gas ‌to ‌the surface as a ⁢byproduct. In many locations,⁢ especially⁢ remote oil fields, there ⁤is no pipeline infrastructure ‌to move this associated gas ⁤to market. Rather than vent it directly (which is worse),operators typically flare ​ the gas-burning it‌ off in open flames. While flaring converts⁤ much ‍of the ‍methane to CO₂, ‌it is ⁤often incomplete and inefficient, still ⁤releasing methane and other​ pollutants into the ​atmosphere.

Bitcoin mining ⁤offers a technological and economic solution:

  • On-site generators: Miners deploy shipping containers packed with ASIC mining rigs and small gas generators directly at the ​oil⁤ well⁢ pad. Rather of flaring, ‌the gas is piped into a generator ⁢that produces⁢ electricity for mining.
  • Higher combustion​ efficiency: Properly ⁢tuned⁢ engines and generators generally burn methane more completely​ than open‌ flares, reducing the share of methane ⁤that​ escapes unburned.
  • Monetizing ⁣stranded gas: What‍ was once⁤ a costly waste product becomes an energy asset. Oil producers can earn revenue or offset costs by selling⁢ or sharing the gas with ⁤mining partners.
  • Regulatory alignment: As ‌regulators tighten limits on flaring, ⁣partnering with miners gives ⁢operators a compliance ⁢pathway​ that also generates⁤ income.

Concrete examples include modular mining outfits that specialize in “flare gas mining,” parking ⁢mobile⁣ data centers in basins‌ across North⁤ America‌ and⁣ beyond. These‍ units reduce flaring,⁢ cut methane leakage, ⁤and demonstrate how Bitcoin mining can⁤ align​ with‌ the decarbonization goals of the oil ⁣and gas‌ sector.

How are Bitcoin miners⁤ turning ⁢landfill⁤ gas⁣ into a ⁤tool for methane​ mitigation?

Landfills emit ⁤methane as organic waste decomposes. Many sites either‌ vent this ‍gas, ​flare it, or⁣ capture only a portion ⁤of it for power generation. The economics of building ‌full-scale gas-to-grid or industrial power projects ‍often do not pencil ‍out for smaller or ‌older​ landfills. This is where Bitcoin mining can ​play a distinctive ⁣role.

By colocating with landfills, miners can:

  • Capture and combust landfill gas: Landfill operators install⁢ gas collection systems that funnel methane into generators.The resulting ⁢electricity powers ‍Bitcoin mining hardware⁤ located on-site.
  • Create new revenue ‍for waste operators: Mining provides a‌ direct⁣ buyer for the⁤ landfill’s⁢ gas,⁤ turning​ a liability ‍into⁢ an income ‌stream and ​making it financially attractive to improve‌ gas capture infrastructure.
  • Scale to site size: ​Where gas volumes⁢ are modest, conventional power projects may be uneconomic, but a right-sized mining deployment can still be profitable and‍ environmentally beneficial.
  • Reduce fugitive emissions: ‌Improved gas capture and ‍controlled combustion mean less ⁢methane leaks⁤ from the‌ landfill⁤ surface​ into the ⁣atmosphere.

Because⁢ methane’s ‌short-term‍ warming ​impact is ⁣so large, even modest⁣ reductions at individual ‍landfill sites ‍can translate into significant climate‍ benefits. Bitcoin ‍mining, as a modular and flexible load, can⁢ make more ‌of those reductions economically feasible.

Can Bitcoin mining really operate off-grid to use methane ⁤that would otherwise‍ be wasted?

Yes.‌ One‍ of ‌the ‍core ⁤advantages of Bitcoin mining as an⁤ industrial load is ‍that it ⁣does not need to be tied to population centers or traditional power​ grids. ​A⁤ mining operation only⁤ needs:

  • A reliable source of energy (such ⁣as methane from​ flaring, ‌landfills, or ‌biogas).
  • Mining hardware ‍and‌ cooling​ systems.
  • Internet ⁤connectivity‍ (increasingly provided‍ by satellite, cellular, or microwave links).

This ‍off-grid ‍capability is critical for methane mitigation because many‌ high-emissions sites are:

  • Remote⁢ oil fields where building⁣ pipelines or‌ grid⁢ connections is ⁤prohibitively expensive.
  • Isolated ⁤landfills or ​waste sites not near large power demand‌ centers.
  • Agricultural ‍operations ‍where biogas is produced but underutilized.

By setting ‌up ‌fully self-contained facilities,miners can move to ‍where‍ the‌ methane ⁣is,rather of⁣ waiting for that⁣ energy ​to be brought⁢ to them. ⁤this flexibility:

  • Unlocks‌ stranded energy: Methane that would have​ been flared or⁢ vented can be converted into electricity on the spot.
  • Eliminates⁢ the need ​for large infrastructure: No new ​high-voltage transmission ⁢lines or⁣ long-distance ⁤pipelines are⁢ required.
  • Responds quickly to changing conditions: ​If a⁣ gas source‍ declines ⁣or‌ regulations change, the mining equipment can be redeployed elsewhere.

Off-grid mining demonstrates ‌how Bitcoin​ can act as a‌ portable energy sink, ‍making it possible to address methane emissions in locations that ​would or else be too costly to⁣ abate.

How do Bitcoin miners⁤ help transform waste methane into a cleaner, more useful form of energy?

From a climate outlook, the⁤ key is​ not​ simply using methane, but how ‍ it is⁤ used. When methane is ⁤burned in controlled conditions to generate electricity, it⁣ is⁣ converted primarily into ‌carbon dioxide and ⁢water vapor. While CO₂ is​ still ⁣a​ greenhouse gas, the overall warming impact per molecule‌ is ⁢far lower than that of⁢ methane.

bitcoin⁤ mining helps accelerate this ⁢transformation by:

  • Providing⁣ a⁢ constant⁢ demand for electricity: mining hardware can‍ run ⁢24/7,which suits ​continuous gas‍ flows ⁢from ‌flares,landfills,or⁢ digesters​ and justifies investment in better⁣ capture and combustion systems.
  • Improving combustion quality: Generators and turbines designed for ‍power‌ production⁣ typically burn gas more⁣ efficiently than open flares, reducing unburned ⁤methane emissions.
  • Supporting ⁢decentralized​ energy ⁢innovation: Some projects integrate mining with microgrids or local use-cases, where⁣ excess electricity can also power nearby facilities, data centers, or community ​infrastructure.
  • Enhancing project economics: ‍ By adding Bitcoin ‍mining revenue to traditional ‍energy sales⁢ or​ environmental credits,operators can fund more robust‍ methane capture ​technologies.

In effect, Bitcoin mining‍ creates a flexible, ‌financeable end-use for waste methane.⁢ This helps shift ‌methane ⁣from being a ⁣poorly managed⁢ byproduct to ⁢a monetized⁣ resource,⁣ encouraging broader adoption ⁢of ⁢capture-and-combust strategies ​that directly reduce greenhouse gas​ intensity.

What are ​some⁢ of​ the main challenges and criticisms⁢ of‍ using Bitcoin mining ‌for methane⁤ reduction?

While the climate-focused⁢ use ⁤of Bitcoin ‌mining is gaining attention,it also faces legitimate⁤ questions and ⁢hurdles:

  • Additional⁢ energy demand‌ concerns: Critics argue that regardless of the ⁢energy source,Bitcoin’s overall energy ‌consumption is too high. Proponents ⁤respond ⁣that targeted deployments​ at emissions ⁤sites⁣ can result in a net‌ climate ⁣benefit by ⁤displacing ⁢methane that would otherwise⁢ be released.
  • Measurement and verification: Quantifying the exact reduction ⁣in methane ‍emissions⁢ can be ⁣complex. Accurate monitoring, ‌transparent reporting, and third-party verification are⁢ needed ⁢to ​ensure claimed ⁤climate benefits are ‍real.
  • Regulatory uncertainty: ⁤Policies on both ‍methane emissions and crypto​ mining ⁣are ‌evolving. Some ⁣jurisdictions are skeptical of mining;⁤ others may support ‍it⁢ if ⁢it ⁣clearly contributes‍ to ⁣emissions⁣ reduction ​goals.
  • Risk⁣ of greenwashing: There is a risk that⁤ some operators may ​market themselves ‍as “green” ⁢without delivering substantial⁢ methane​ reductions. Robust standards and ⁢scrutiny⁢ from regulators, ​investors, and ​civil society⁤ are essential.
  • Technology and ⁣capital constraints: Deploying‌ generators, data⁤ centers, and gas capture ‌equipment requires capital and expertise. Smaller operators or developing regions may struggle without financing or partnerships.

Addressing these ​challenges will determine how widely Bitcoin-based methane ‌mitigation⁢ scales-and whether it is embraced as‌ a credible climate solution rather than a‍ niche ⁣experiment.

What​ is the broader ⁢climate ‌significance​ of Bitcoin ⁢mining that targets methane​ emissions?

Methane reduction ⁤is widely recognized as one of the fastest ways‍ to slow near-term global warming. International‌ initiatives, such as the Global ​Methane Pledge,​ highlight ‌the need ⁢for rapid cuts in emissions ⁢from energy, waste, and agriculture.⁢ In that​ context,Bitcoin mining’s ability to:

  • Rapidly deploy to remote ⁤methane sources,
  • Monetize waste gases that are⁤ otherwise uneconomical​ to capture,and
  • Operate flexibly as a⁤ modular,location-agnostic load,

positions ​it⁢ as a potentially valuable ⁤tool in the methane mitigation toolkit.

If ⁣scaled ​responsibly-with transparent data, clear environmental accounting, and‌ supportive​ regulation-Bitcoin mining ⁢tied⁤ to methane capture could:

  • Deliver meaningful cuts‍ in‌ short-lived⁢ climate pollutants.
  • Incentivize cleaner practices in​ oil and gas,‌ waste management, and agriculture.
  • Reframe parts‌ of the ​crypto industry ⁤as active contributors to ‍climate solutions rather than simply energy consumers.

The ultimate climate‍ impact⁤ will depend on ⁣how quickly and credibly these methane-focused mining projects ‍grow, and whether their model can be​ replicated across the ⁢most ⁣methane-intensive ‌regions and ​industries worldwide.

In Retrospect

As these examples show, ‌Bitcoin mining is no longer confined to the​ stereotype ⁤of⁣ warehouses packed with energy‑hungry⁣ machines. ⁢From⁣ capturing⁣ flared​ gas at oil fields to monetizing landfill​ methane and stabilizing remote renewable ⁣projects, miners are ⁢beginning‌ to ​function ⁣as ‍flexible, mobile load⁤ that can turn one ⁢of the most potent greenhouse gases into ​a revenue‌ stream-and, in​ the process, a⁣ climate solution.

None of this makes Bitcoin​ mining inherently “green,” nor does it negate the sector’s broader environmental challenges. The scale of methane ​emissions ‌from fossil fuel operations, ​agriculture, and waste⁢ dwarfs what ​Bitcoin can currently address, and many of these⁢ projects are still early‑stage ⁣or‌ geographically limited.

But the case studies ​emerging today point to a meaningful shift: ​instead of competing with households and ​industry for grid power, a growing share ⁢of miners are⁤ positioning themselves at the margins ⁢of ​the energy ​system,‍ where⁣ waste ⁣and inefficiency are greatest. If ⁤that trend continues-and ‍if regulators and ⁢energy producers push ⁢harder to curb ‌methane leaks-bitcoin’s most consequential ⁤environmental story ⁢may ⁣unfold not in⁤ data centers, but in the oilfields, ‍landfills, and remote energy sites that have long⁢ struggled to put their ‍wasted ⁣gas to productive ⁤use.

Previous Article

Bitmine Publishes New Chairman’s Message Explaining Why Shareholders Should Vote YES to Approve the Amendment to Increase Authorized Shares

Next Article

Copper, gold and bitcoin: A macro signal to watch

You might be interested in …